0-62 times in the wet

Twingo Forum

Help Support Twingo Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
weebob":2u88fex8 said:
maggi112":2u88fex8 said:
DrDrew":2u88fex8 said:
Dubz":2u88fex8 said:
Ok, some time in mid/late July?

Yeah with the rs app. I had full 3G and it was calibrated properly.

I've had 9.6 on a stopwatch a friend was timing

Isn't the official time for the 1.2 12 seconds?

It maybe but i actually fell asleep before the one I test drove got there

Lol,

had a few as courtesy cars, they are slow and they dont pretend to be anything else. 0-60 isnt what a low powered city car is build for. To be far its not were the RS133 shines either.

It's the handling :/
 
Dubz":29b3tzyx said:
weebob":29b3tzyx said:
maggi112":29b3tzyx said:
DrDrew":29b3tzyx said:
Dubz":29b3tzyx said:
Ok, some time in mid/late July?

Yeah with the rs app. I had full 3G and it was calibrated properly.

I've had 9.6 on a stopwatch a friend was timing

Isn't the official time for the 1.2 12 seconds?

It maybe but i actually fell asleep before the one I test drove got there

Lol,

had a few as courtesy cars, they are slow and they dont pretend to be anything else. 0-60 isnt what a low powered city car is build for. To be far its not were the RS133 shines either.

It's the handling :/

Yes it is, didnt think I needed to say that bit but +1 forum point for you sir.
 
maggi112":11a7a1xk said:
-1 point for buying the wrong car though :p

-2 for silly claims.

Dubz I will of course rescind all this once some decent proof has been provided, I may also buy a 1.2 twingo as having a "easy on the fuel" 1.2 thats only 3 seconds to 62 than my RS197 has got to be a win.
 
weebob":24e1pqnd said:
Dubz":24e1pqnd said:
weebob":24e1pqnd said:
maggi112":24e1pqnd said:
DrDrew":24e1pqnd said:
Dubz said:
Ok, some time in mid/late July?

Yeah with the rs app. I had full 3G and it was calibrated properly.

I've had 9.6 on a stopwatch a friend was timing

Isn't the official time for the 1.2 12 seconds?

It maybe but i actually fell asleep before the one I test drove got there

Lol,

had a few as courtesy cars, they are slow and they dont pretend to be anything else. 0-60 isnt what a low powered city car is build for. To be far its not were the RS133 shines either.

It's the handling :/

Yes it is, didnt think I needed to say that bit but +1 forum point for you sir.

I was on about my I-music :p
 
Yup, agreed, (point still stands, that is what I was alluding to) they are cracking handling cars
 
photo.PNG

sorry for the awful pic, but you can kinda make out the 7.6 sec for 0-60 :) ignore the 1/4 mile as ran out of road


forgot to add that the time was with a standard car as well, not even a air filter change
 
lol... looks like a stirred up quite a conversation with this one...lol

all in jest if i've read it right... ;) hehe
 
ILikeWhereThisThreadIsGoing.jpg
 
kevnbex":2akz82u7 said:
lol... looks like a stirred up quite a conversation with this one...lol

all in jest if i've read it right... ;) hehe

Mention 0-60 and its always the same :lol:
 
Id say the 8.7 is about right. Book figures for a vts is 7.6 and the twingo to me feels a little slower so about right.
 
BlackTwingo-i":2q9foouy said:
My cars handeling is brilliant.. Ask the clios and twingos i was smoking round the corners in wales! ;)
I wouldn't say smoking. But you defiantly werent hanging about. More probably to do with your massive balls of steal
 
Ross in the other clio nearly overtook me on a straight, my life was nearly over.. But then we came to a corner so he backed off, and my bragging began all over again xD
 
BlackTwingo-i":2azi1r0p said:
Ross in the other clio nearly overtook me on a straight, my life was nearly over.. But then we came to a corner so he backed off, and my bragging began all over again xD
lol
 
Top